Tughlaq Dynasty — Muhammad bin Tughlaq and Firoz Shah
Overview
The Tughlaqs, of Qaraunah Turk origin, ruled for nearly a century. The dynasty produced the most remarkable — and most controversial — Sultan of Delhi, Muhammad bin Tughlaq, whom historians have called “a mixture of opposites.”
| Ruler | Period | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Ghiyas-ud-din Tughlaq | 1320–1325 | Founder; built Tughlaqabad |
| Muhammad bin Tughlaq | 1325–1351 | Brilliant, eccentric; controversial experiments |
| Firoz Shah Tughlaq | 1351–1388 | Administrator, builder; orthodox and bigoted |
| Later Tughlaqs | 1388–1414 | Decline; Timur’s invasion (1398) |
Ghiyas-ud-din Tughlaq (1320–1325)
- Ghazi Malik; governor of Dipalpur under Alauddin Khalji
- Defeated Khusrau Khan and ascended the throne
- Construction: Tughlaqabad Fort (massive fortification near Delhi)
- Reversed Alauddin’s harsh revenue system; moderate taxation
- Constructed canals; extended agriculture
- Bengal expedition: His son Jauna Khan (later Muhammad bin Tughlaq) successfully campaigned
- Death: killed by the collapse of a wooden pavilion arranged by his son (accident or design?) — debated
Muhammad bin Tughlaq (1325–1351)
The most learned and brilliant, yet also the most controversial and unsuccessful Sultan of Delhi. He was a scholar: knew Arabic, Persian, Sanskrit; well-versed in philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, logic, medicine, and poetry.
His “Five Disastrous Experiments” (Conventional View)
Modern historians like Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi argue that many of his schemes were sound in conception but failed in execution due to implementation flaws, not conceptual errors.
1. Transfer of Capital (1327)
- Moved capital from Delhi to Devagiri (renamed Daulatabad)
- Reason: Daulatabad was centrally located for governing the expanded empire (especially the Deccan)
- Execution: Ordered the entire population of Delhi to migrate
- Result: Disaster — immense suffering; people died on the journey; Delhi became a ghost town
- Eventually abandoned and capital moved back to Delhi
- Ibn Battuta described Delhi as “almost deserted”
2. Token Currency (1329–1330)
- Introduced bronze/copper coins with the same face value as silver tankas
- Reason: Silver was scarce; copper was abundant; inspired by Chinese paper money system
- Failure: The Sultan did not maintain a monopoly on minting; anyone could counterfeit copper coins
- “Every house became a mint” (Barani) — massive forgery
- Foreign merchants refused copper coins; trade collapsed
- Sultan had to withdraw the token currency, exchanging copper coins for silver — treasury drained
3. Khurasan Expedition
- Planned to conquer Khurasan (Persia and Central Asia) — raise an army of 370,000 men
- Paid soldiers for one year; then abandoned the campaign
- Reason: Conditions in Central Asia changed; the expedition became unnecessary
- Result: Huge financial loss; army dispersed
4. Qarachil Expedition
- Sent an army to the Himalayas (Kumaon-Garhwal region; Chinese border)
- Objective unclear; possibly to counter a Chinese threat or secure mountain passes
- The entire army of 10,000 was destroyed by the terrain and local attacks
- Only a few survivors returned
5. Increased Revenue in the Doab
- Raised land revenue in the Ganga-Yamuna Doab (fertile heartland) by 5–10 times
- Timing disaster: This coincided with a severe famine (1334–1335)
- Peasants abandoned lands; fled to forests; rebelled
- Sultan had to rescind the tax; provided relief (sondhar loans for seeds, wells, agriculture)
- But the damage was done — permanent loss of revenue
Rebellions During His Reign
Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s reign saw constant rebellions that fragmented the empire:
| Region | Founder | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Bengal | Fakhruddin Mubarak Shah | Became independent (1338) |
| Madurai | Jalal-ud-din Ahsan Shah | Madurai Sultanate (1334) |
| Vijayanagara | Harihara and Bukka | Hindu empire in the South (1336) |
| Deccan | Hasan Gangu (Ala-ud-din Bahman Shah) | Bahmani Kingdom (1347) |
By the end of his reign, the Sultanate had shrunk to just north India.
Positive Aspects
Despite his failures, Muhammad bin Tughlaq had remarkable achievements:
- Ibn Battuta’s visit: The Moroccan traveler visited his court (1333–1341); served as Qazi of Delhi for 8 years
- Muhammad bin Tughlaq sent Ibn Battuta as ambassador to the Mongol court of China
- Agricultural relief: Introduced sondhar (agricultural loans); created a separate department (Diwan-i-Amir-i-Kohi) for agricultural development
- Brought uncultivated lands under plough
- Justice: Strict administration of justice; punished even high nobles and his own relatives for crimes
- Patron of arts and sciences; maintained intellectual exchanges with the Islamic world
- Maintained the empire mostly intact despite rebellions
- Died in 1351 fighting rebels in Sindh (Thatta)
Assessment
Historians have dramatically revised the traditional view:
- Traditional (Barani, Elphinstone): “Mad king”; “a mixture of opposites”; “half-mad visionary”
- Modern (I.H. Qureshi, K.A. Nizami): An intelligent, well-intentioned ruler whose ideas were ahead of their time; failed due to poor execution and opposition of vested interests (nobility, ulema)
- Key flaw: impatience, lack of foresight about human nature, and failure to build consensus
Firoz Shah Tughlaq (1351–1388)
Firoz Shah was the opposite of his cousin Muhammad bin Tughlaq — orthodox, predictable, and a “welfare” administrator rather than an innovator.
Accession
- After Muhammad’s death, the army in Sindh was leaderless; threatened by Mongols
- Nobles persuaded Firoz (Muhammad’s cousin) to accept the throne
- He was reluctant at first; needed the assurance of nobles and ulema
Religious Policy
- Orthodoxy personified: Consulted ulema on all matters; sought Caliph’s recognition twice
- Bigoted against non-Muslims:
- Jiziya strictly enforced (even Brahmins — previously exempt — had to pay)
- Destroyed Hindu temples and images; banned construction of new ones
- Persecuted Shia Muslims and “heretical” Sufis
- Banned practice of visiting Hindu shrines
- Banned painting and portrait-making (in line with Islamic orthodoxy)
- Converted Hindus to Islam by offering tax exemptions
- Made grants (madad-i-maash) to religious scholars and Sufi saints on a massive scale
Administrative Reforms
- Hereditary iqtas: Made iqta assignments hereditary (reversed Alauddin’s system); led to a feudal-like nobility
- Hereditary offices: Military and civil posts became hereditary
- Army paid through assignments of village revenues (no standing cash-paid army)
- Confiscation of private properties limited: Nobles could accumulate wealth without fear
- This weakened the central state permanently
Welfare Measures
| Measure | Description |
|---|---|
| Irrigation canals | Built 5 major canals: Yamuna to Hissar, Sutlej to Ghaggar, Ghaggar to Firozabad, etc. |
| New cities | Firozabad (Delhi), Jaunpur (in memory of Muhammad bin Tughlaq), Firozpur, Hissar |
| Public works | Mosques, colleges, hospitals, public baths, bridges, serais (rest houses) |
| Employment | Created Diwan-i-Khairat (Department of Charity) for unemployed, orphans, widows |
| Marriage Bureau | Arranged marriages for poor Muslim girls; provided dowries from state treasury |
| Slave system | Maintained 180,000 slaves; created a separate department (Diwan-i-Bandagan); employed in crafts and services |
Legal Reforms
- Abolished torture and mutilation as punishments
- Abolished confiscation of property of deceased persons (except criminals)
- Compiled a legal code (Fatawa-i-Jahandari based on Barani’s advice)
Military Weakness
- Army quality declined (hereditary positions; no cash salaries)
- Bengal became independent (1353 campaign failed), again in 1359 — Firoz could not pacify it permanently
- Failed Deccan campaign: Could not subjugate Bahmanis and Vijayanagara
Architecture
Firoz Shah was a prolific builder. He was fascinated with Ashokan pillars — transported two (from Topra and Meerut) to Delhi and erected them.
| Structure | Place | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Firoz Shah Kotla | Delhi | Fifth city of Delhi; Ashokan pillar; Jami Masjid |
| Madrasa at Hauz Khas | Delhi | College around Alauddin’s tank |
| Kotla Firoz Shah | Hissar | Fort and palaces |
| Buildings at Jaunpur | UP | Founded the city |
Decline After Firoz Shah
- Firoz’s death (1388) unleashed succession wars among his descendants
- Two rival Sultans in Delhi at the same time
- Provinces became independent: Jaunpur (Sharqi), Malwa, Gujarat, Bengal
- Timur’s Invasion (1398): The Mongol conqueror Timur (Tamerlane) invaded India; sacked Delhi; massacred thousands
- Delhi took months to recover; Tughlaq dynasty effectively ended
- Last Tughlaq ruler died in 1414; Khizr Khan founded the Sayyid dynasty as Timur’s deputy
Sources for the Tughlaq Period
| Source | Author | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi | Ziauddin Barani | History up to Firoz Shah; critique of Muhammad bin Tughlaq |
| Fatawa-i-Jahandari | Barani | Mirror of princes; advice on governance |
| Futuh-us-Salatin | Isami | Versified history from Ghaznavids to early Muhammad bin Tughlaq |
| Rehla (Travels) | Ibn Battuta | Detailed account of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s court and India |
| Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi | Shams Siraj Afif | Reign of Firoz Shah Tughlaq |
| Autobiography | Firoz Shah Tughlaq | Futuhat-i-Firoz Shahi — Firoz’s own account of his works |